Friday, May 11, 2018

Qanon for busy people.

Qanon for busy people.
Q is an account on 8chan an anonymous chat site. Q claims to be a Q level intelligence officer with White House authorization to post on the site.
 Sensitivity Level 3 or 4. Q is DoE terminology but everyone uses it now. At one point he posts what may be a security Authorization code: auth478-24zgP
He/they is posting hints, clues, questions, riddles, photo's and links. He predict events a day or so ahead sometimes. He quotes Trump and Trump has made intentional mistakes in tweets that confirm that Q is real and authorized. Q talks about wendy with Obama in posts. Then Trump posts a tweet including 'wendy wasserman schultz' and corrects a few hours latter.

That was not a mistake it was a message. Wendy has meaning behind the scenes. Girl running with the gang. (Possibly second generation girls on the left who know nothing else. My opinion.)

In effect this is a controlled leak system to debunk and negate the made up leaks in the main stream media. This is the stuff they can't put on twitter.  Q has used " we " on a few occasion indicating its a team.

The White House needs to activate millennials and the conspiracy fans. They need to get libertarians on side. They can't do that with Fox news, breitbart or c-span. Millennials don't do those things they are on sites like 4chan, 8chan etc that is where Trump has sent someone to work. A ranking intelligence officer no less. He is building a network of thousands of volunteers working on finding the linkages, identifying deep state actors, and creating memes, YouTube, and other social media. It gets the conspiracy theory minded millennials aimed in the right direction. It's a psychological warfare operation aimed at the heart of the deep state. Designed to demoralize them.

He is also implying that there have been several false flag operations foiled recently with clues about the NY subway bombing. Hints before hand that something was about to happen connected to Bangladesh. The injured suicide bomber was Bangladeshi. It indicates that they knew who but not where yet had enough to stop the guy.

Also he gave hints before hand of the Hawaii events with assurances afterwards that the Patriots in the intelligence and military are on top of the false flag cases now. 

He has established the inside terms wizards and warlocks. Both are intell/military with the wizards being the good guys and the warlocks being bad.
{I stand corrected the warlocks are good guys too. Possibly Navy intelligence. }
He is also indicating that military intelligence is now investigating the FBI, NSA and CIA elite for illegal activities. Ouch!

Early on some of his messages were cryptic designed to contact patriots in those agencies without tipping off the corrupt ones. A bit like the nonsensical messages broadcast into France before D-Day to inform and direct the French resistance.

He is also indicating that Australia and New Zealand are involved. Hopefully on both sides.  Hillary Clinton is Hiding out in New Zealand and Australia this month, May 2018.

The White House is not only using wikileaks now but using their tactics to go around the barriers: the MSM and silicon valley leftist controlled social media. You can't make this stuff up!

Here are the Q post at source.
with discussion in the link below there are a lot of nuts and trolls on qresearch.

That's hard to navigate. The best list of posts is here: and for older ones.

This week he posted a piece of blank White house stationary, the Presidents pen and leather document binder. All taken from the Presidents point of view.

People have created side by side meme showing the confirmation posts. One of these proof images. 

Thursday, February 01, 2018

Reforming global currency and debt.

Someone on YouTube predicted the final collapse of the world fiat currency system. He ruled out violent revolution. His solution:
Plan 1 Tax strike: but then you get thrown in jail.
Plan 2 Blockade congress: OK = get thrown in jail with friends.
Plan 3 call for a military mutiny against government. Err... wait how is that not violent revolution?

Some of us have a better set of plans.
1. Develop replacement currencies bitcoin and gold notes.
2. Point out to those in power that in a currency collapse their favourite shop in Brussels, New York or Washington wont be able to restock. They will starve with the rest of us.
3. Develop Assurance Contract sites [crowd funding] and debug it by crowd funding cool stuff.
4. Crowd fund those things [public goods] that government claims to do with taxes and borrowing. Thus making taxes obsolete and getting stuff done faster.
5. Authorise the creation of thousands of new debt free banks (congress just did that bit last year).

We are not finished yet but there are a lot of people in high places with bitcoin accounts just in case.

Sunday, January 28, 2018

Shadow banning and Demonetization.

Most conservatives probably think the left is just demonetizing the right on YouTube but they are doing it to almost everyone including some popular gamer YouTubers, people talking about Star Trek and Star Wars and even popular arts and crafts YouTubers!?! Similar things are happening on Facebook and Twitter and even some of the art sites like Pinterest. 

Something more than just left verses right bias is happening. I think a key part of their algorithm is broken. All these sites are trying to take out Islamist's content on their sites; It is reasonable to expect a counter attack from the Islamists. The simplest counter attack is to get everything else banned too. Reporting sites both conservative and profitable as spam, porn, terrorist and otherwise contrary to the the allowed policy. There is no way all reported material can be reviewed in two or three days. It is definitional of social media that there is too much for any human to screen. The Algorithms them selves are vulnerable to trolling and abuse.

So Islamists are reporting anything and everything, while people on the left are reporting conservative and right wing stuff as say porn when its not. It is interestingly rare for people on the right to falsely report the left even for genuinely offensive material. To the right such things should be seen both to rally the cause and to some extent because they are seen as signs of desperation on the left.

The algorithm bans reported pages etc automatically or demonetizes the YouTube account. It is Guilty until proven innocent and if you don't complain to the overworked people in the head office then human eyes never check the post that's reported or the channel that's demonetized. Both Facebook and YouTube is losing money as a result.

Worse still with content in some parts of Asia, the people checking the content there are sub contractors in Pakistan and other predominantly Islamic countries. India is priced out of the market and don't know the languages. So you have Muslims looking at and trying to screen content for Islamic terrorism and porn!

There is only one solution. Social media needs to drop anonymous reporting and switch to pseudo-anonymous reporting with a rating system for reports. Those found to be reporting non porn sites as porn should be down-rated and ignored when they reach a threshold.
Like wise anyone that is falsely reporting  sites as somehow unacceptable need to be logged, down-rated and ignored. Those who report terrorist, crime and real nasty porn should be up rated too and given priority on the ban/ block.

This will not fully solve the bias in the social media screeners but a second rating algorithm is needed in that case. If non porn but “insensitive” material flags are used this is where we get the biggest political problem.

The bulk of social media screeners are university educated young people and so tend to be on the left. (The universities may be greatly reformed soon but that is a different matter.) Many will also grow out of their leftist positions as they get smashed in the face by hard reality. Many on the left can't afford to live in California any more.

The first solution is to check the number of likes. A site with truly insensitive material should not have a lot of public likes. Prager university will have millions of likes where as some random holocaust denier will have only a few dozen. A pro terrorist jihad site will have a low base in the English world while a site critical of Islamic terrorism will have a much larger base, even though the same video may appear on both: one is a warning and so, like the naked victims of the holocaust, must be seen. 

Then jury the question across several people in the public network. The dislike button should have some weight but there is a problem. People use that if they like the context but disagree with its conclusion. It is possible to be both very popular, widely shared with 70% dislikes. A like but disagree button may help.

If neutrality is genuinely desired by these companies then this should suffice. If however the staff of Google, Facebook, YouTube and twitter are genuinely left of centre then there is little that can be done to save these businesses. Capital and advertising are both very capitalist things. Competition is arising: Gab, Twitch TV, Wistia, Vidyard, Brightcove, SproutVideo, Vimeo. This is just for YouTube.

That said Facebook and YouTube have seen a drop off in views and I suspect the Chief Financial Officer will over rule and political bias on the board. Left wing CEO's and their companies are quickly separated.

So I think vetting the people trolling social media will be implemented. If, as I suspect, Islamists and trolls are attacking western social media itself even the left wing staff of YouTube and Facebook will grasp that they need to vet the anonymous reports of content and ignore the false reports.

All the ELUA's will need to be changed with a line or two on gaming the system added. Some countries my also need to change legislation.

Wesley Bruce

Sunday, October 15, 2017

How President Crump has won.

I have my Facebook friends completely confused when I talk US politics.
One asked:
"Do you think RINOs helped nominate Trump because they thought he was least likely to win against Hillary?"

No I think Reince Priebus and the RINO's were trying to block Ted Cruz and the Freedom Caucus at all costs. They used Trump to block Cruz but then failed to organise someone to topple Trump at the convention via the second or third vote strategy. They tried to manipulate the convention and its rules but botched it.
Their candidates Jeb Bush and John Kasich were no match for Hillary. In simple terms they believed their own propaganda about Bush and Kasich and believed the lefts propaganda about Hillary beating conservatives like Ted Cruz. I doubt they really thought it though with Trump until Jeb Bush dropped out. At the convention they blocked Ted but had no-one else to go with as a candidate from the floor. Romney and several others turned the plotters down. Anyone inclined to accept was clearly un-electable.

So they switched to plan B get Trump elected and controlling him. I don't think they expected Hillary to win. She had lost the rust belt to Trump and the black vote was lost to Facebook history memes of the KKK democrat party connections. The black vote stayed home.

To get Trump to a winning number on the first vote they transferred votes from Bush and Kasich to Trump without telling the delegates or Trump. Ted Cruz had the numbers to force it to a second vote and would have won the second convention vote. That was unacceptable to some at the convention.

Ted Cruz saw Reince Priebus attempt to control of Trump coming. He also saw the great danger of Hillary winning in the south east and south west where Trump was weakest but in those areas Ted Cruz was much stronger so he passed almost all of his campaign personnel to Trump. He also seems to have passed all his cabinet picks and maybe his VP pick, Mike Pence, to Trump creating an unbeatable machine in the election. Kellyanne Conway was added to the mix to keep things organised. She was a Cruz organiser and fund raiser.

Then once back in the Senate Ted Cruz and the Freedom Caucus  launched a policy blitz beating Priebus out of the White house. As the battle for Obamacare repeal and replace progressed Priebus was blocking the Freedom caucus and other conservatives from getting to Trump. The RINO's that backed and wanted to control Trump actually do not have any viable alternative policies. They have never articulated policy to achieve Trumps goals or their own. The freedom caucus is clear and public in terms of goals and policy.

Instead of fighting Trump the freedom caucus is trying to find ways to make the results Trump articulated policy work. That is why the wall is a fence in places. They already knew, as do Trump supporters, that the key is enforcement and that the guards need to be able to see through the wall in most places. Priebus recommendations failed repeatedly, while Cruz had got working people and policies in where it mattered. Eventually Reince Priebus had to leave beaten. 

So what about Steve Bannon?
Steve Bannon and also Newt Gingrich and Pat Buchanan were all on board with Trump early. I suspect that they all sounded out Ted Cruz and a few others in 2014 but Cruz, Rand Paul and others Libertarian favoring caucus members would not go along with all of their plans.
Bannon, Gingrich, Buchanan want protectionism to be the banner but a different kind of protectionism than the 1930's and 1960's. All conservatives not just Ted Cruz want real free trade not fake free trade but he is not willing to threaten protectionism to get it. The catch is that without threats of protectionism your going into a trade negotiation empty handed and naked. [No you can't do free trade by simple declaration as the libertarians want to. ] Trump understood the need to threaten protectionism to get true free trade so they backed Trump.

I think Cruz (and Newt) also understands that some industries are truly obsolete and will never return and that's is a real problem for the percentage of people in those dying fields that genuinely can't be retrained.

The past six months all five men have learned that they will have to converge their positions creating a more nuanced program of policies. If they can't do that they wont get a policies though.

Bannon has not been kicked out of the White house. He has realized that the problem is not the committees in the White house. Attending meetings is point less if you discover that the committee all agrees yet the government genuinely can't do some things even with full control of both houses and the White house.

It needs to be not just take a majority in congress. You must obliterate the Democrats and the RINO's AND 30 million bureaucrats that will not implement policy even when ordered to. (That's a big unreported story).

In that you need a permanent campaign mode and so Bannon has been redeployed where he can do the most good at Breitbart.
Bannon is not a libertarian or CATO type conservative so he still disagrees with Ted Cruz and Rand Paul on things. And Cruz and Paul differ to. Like me he probably thinks that such things will work but that we simply can't sell them. This was always Ted's problem you can't talk complex policy in a pub. Newt has the same problem. Unintelligible policy wonks might be right but can't win if no-one understands a word their saying. Trump simply does not try.

In the next months we will see people aligned to both Trump and Cruz running against incumbent RINO's that face re election in 2018. There will also be people running against the most vulnerable Democrats in the Rust belt. The DNC gerrymandered those blue collar districts to hold them half a century ago but with the blue collar vote flipping to Trump they guaranteed they will now loose them.

Watch the southern black districts too. A new generation of black Republicans are running there and the same memes that broke Hillary's grip in 2016 will now switching up to the next stages pointing out that Marx, Lenin, Andrew Jackson and Lyndon B. Johnson were not black and that Frederick Douglass, the first black congressmen and Martin Luther King jr were all Republicans. The democrats are not being helped by black lives matter crowds with marxist banners or KKK actively reminding everyone that they were once called the "the military arm of the Democratic Party". These things are piling up and will drive a disconnect between socialism and black rights. It will happen very fast without warning and the DNC can only afford to loose 10% of the black vote to loose half the south permanently.

The Democrats have lost the old industrial states on the great lakes. The left is losing its grip on the black vote. The LGBT block is tiny; vocal but not enough to matter and Harvey Weinstein has blown up half the feminist vote and most of the Hollywood lobby. The party may even die!

The RINO's, called the Tuesday group in congress, are a policy free zone. Out of ideas. They are pro-military and pro-police but left of center or clueless on everything else. They will face conservatives in their primaries. They will be forced to shift or loose well before November 2018.
We will get President Crump. Policy Ted Cruz, Rand Paul, etc signed into law by Trump to achieve his agenda because there is no other way.

PS technically everyone's kicked out of the White house, not just Bannon, because their doing maintenance. No one is reporting where the National Security Council meetings are being held while they rip the wiretaps out of the Oval office.  

Wednesday, July 19, 2017


A star gate ship model. 
The Udajeet. This is the single seat death glider from the movie. Very fiddly curves.

The colours are royal purple, priestly purple, sky blue, silver and black. These are place holder materials. It has no weapons because someone else has made the weapons already.

There are differences with the movie version. However there are differences within the shots. It seems that top rail is close to the hull in one shot and farther out in another. Probably green screen artefacts.

The back wing edges are not perfectly straight but you barely see that in the movie.

Do the Goa'ald even have a word for landing gear?

Inside of the cockpit. Almost steam punk controls. This is very much simplified. The modeller went mad with greebles. 

In some movie shots the model looks grey or blue so the colours show this is clearly Ra's personal Udajeet.
More progress with the udajeet. 

Sunday, May 21, 2017

Friday, March 24, 2017

4 memes showing the anarchist vacuum

4 memes showing the anarchist vacuum.
Someone posted this on Facebook:

It is very very libertarian but it is sadly wrong. The anarchist vacuum problem. No safeguards.
I fixed it making another version.
Yes its more complicated but that's the point. The free market is not a void or a magic fairy or even an invisible hand. We can't predict all the out comes but we can identify some of the known mechanisms.  

Then later in another facebook discussion a similar one was added:
Without government, who would provide _________?

 It does not deal with the fundamental reasons for taxation in the first place, the assurance problem. So I fixed that one too.

In both cases anarchists are attempting to replace something with nothing. Generating huge risks and making their policy positions unsaleable to the majority of voters. 

I have yet to find a good one on foreign policy. When I do I'll fix it and add it.